A disappointment of stellar proportions

[elvum]

So, it seems that the Star has gone downhill again. The beer is still fine, but there's no way that Fullers would risk the reputation of a pub that's been in every edition of the Good Beer Guide, so that's no surprise. The disappointment is the food. The steaks have gone up in price again, to £14. I don't mind paying £14 for a steak. But I do mind paying £14 for four measly ounces of overcooked ribeye. It could just be that the kitchen was busy, or that they were trying to eke out a dwindling supply of meat (neither of which would be acceptable, but would at least suggest that standards hadn't plummeted), but the continental meat platter we had as a starter was pretty mediocre, too. It's under new management again.

My disappointment was so bitter (and the portions now so meagre) that I bought a fillet steak from M&S at Victoria, and cooked it rare and ate it just with wholegrain mustard when I got home.

Avoid for another year, I suggest.

Comments

[aca.livejournal.com]

Everyone has their own view on value. Mine is somewhat more flexible then that. But I guess I've not been a student for 7 years so my view may have been somewhat different back then. :)

[shuripentu.livejournal.com]

Well, I would certainly be a bit peeved if I paid £14 (or really anything more than £5) for a plate of food and still felt hungry after I'd ate it. :)

[elvum.livejournal.com]

Also citing conversations on #flat, I would argue that there are reasons for buying, making and eating food other than satiety, but that one's opinion on the importance of (some of) them depends considerably on disposable income...

I would not mind paying £14 for one of several courses in a restaurant where the quality was sufficient for me to think that it was good value, even if that course alone didn't fill me up. But I couldn't afford to go to that kind of restaurant more than once or twice a year. :-)